[Improving the experience of racialized immigrant seniors in Quebec]. / Améliorer l'expérience des personnes âgées immigrantes racialisées au Québec.

In Quebec, racialized immigrant seniors (AIRs) are a significant presence in long-term care facilities (CHSLDs) in the Greater Montreal area. To identify interventions that best meet their needs, this study interviewed 12 RIAs, including their families, about their experience in CHSLDs. The results show that RIAs face three challenges: food, clothing and play. Addressing these issues could improve their LTRCC experience.

[Eritema pigmentado fijo secundario a AINE: Reporte de caso].

Background: Fixed erythema pigmento (FPE) is an allergic drug reaction, the pathophysiology of which is not exactly known. It is more common in women with location on the face. Clinical presentation: round or oval red-purple macule, well defined, with swelling, pain, itching, and burning. Diagnosis is clinical, oral chal- lenge is contraindicated due to possible severe reaction. On withdrawal of the drug, residual violaceous hyperpigmentation remains. Case report: 34-year-old female diagnosed with allergic rhinitis and asthma. She received treatment with ibuprofen and cephalexin 1 month ago due to dental infection. For the past 2 weeks, she has presented dermatological lesions characterized by hyperpigmentation under the lower eyelids, accompanied by pain, burning, and itching. On physical examination, well-defined red-purple pigmentation was observed in both periocular regions. The challenge test is not justified, the clinical history is the diagnostic pillar. The indication is to stop the medication immediately and continue monitoring. Conclusions: EPF is a drug reaction related to drug use. It creates a challenge for diagnosis due to poor knowledge of the characteristics of the dermatosis and poor clinical and pharmacological questioning. The EPF approach requires knowing the clinical characteristics of this dermatosis, making a differential diagnosis with other lesions and indicating the suspension of the responsible medication.

Antecedentes: El eritema pigmentado fijo (EPF) es una reacción alérgica medicamentosa, de la cual no se conoce con exactitud la fisiopatología. Es más frecuente en la mujer con localización en la cara. Presentación clínica: mácula redonda u oval de color rojo-violáceo, bien delimitada, con edema con dolor, prurito y ardor. El diagnóstico es clínico, contraindicado el reto oral por posible reacción grave. Al retirar el fármaco, queda una hiperpigmentación residual violácea. Reporte de caso: Femenina de 34 años con diagnóstico de rinitis alérgica y asma, Recibió tratamiento con Ibuprofeno y cefalexina hace 1 mes debido a proceso infeccioso dental. Desde hace 2 semanas presenta lesiones dermatológicas caracterizadas por hiperpigmentación debajo de párpados inferiores, acompañado de dolor, ardor y prurito. A la exploración física en ambas regiones perioculares se observa pigmentación bien delimitada rojo-violáceo. La prueba de reto no se justifica, la historia clínica es el pilar diagnóstico. La indicación es suspender el medicamento de inmediato y vigilancia continua. Conclusiones: El EPF es una reacción a medicamentos relacionada con el consumo de fármacos. Genera un desafío para el diagnóstico debido al pobre conocimien- to de las características de la dermatosis y un deficiente interrogatorio clínico y farmacológico. El abordaje del EPF requiere conocer las características clínicas de esta dermatosis, realizar el diagnostico diferencial con otras lesiones e indicar la suspensión del medicamento responsable.

Non-surgical treatment of aseptic olecranon bursitis: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Olecranon bursitis (OB), characterized by inflammation and fluid collection in the olecranon bursa is a commonly encountered out-patient condition. The data is heterogeneous regarding a stepwise and standardized approach to aseptic OB treatment and the efficacy of intra-bursal corticosteroid injections (CSI). The objective of this review is to systematically evaluate the non-surgical treatment options for aseptic OB. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA recommendations. The English and non-English literature search was performed in 5 medical databases to identify studies evaluating the treatment of OB. All included studies were evaluated for risk of bias (RoB) using the revised Cochrane RoB tool for randomized control trials (RCTs) and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for case-control and cohort studies. RESULTS: For the final analyses, 2 RCTs and 2 observational studies were included. The RoB for the RCTs was high and both failed to demonstrate a significant difference in terms of the resolution of OB and bursal tenderness among various invasive and non-invasive treatment options. Corticosteroid injection (CSI) was associated with a significant decline in the duration of symptoms. However, it was associated with a higher number of complications including bursal infection and skin atrophy. CONCLUSION: Based on the available data, it appears that the clinical resolution of aseptic OB can occur with conservative methods if implemented earlier in the disease course. Although CSI is more effective than other treatments, it should be reserved for refractory cases because of a higher complication rate.

Non-surgical treatment of aseptic olecranon bursitis: A systematic review / Tratamiento no quirúrgico de la bursitis olecraniana aséptica: revisión sistemática

Objective: Olecranon bursitis (OB), characterized by inflammation and fluid collection in the olecranon bursa is a commonly encountered out-patient condition. The data is heterogeneous regarding a stepwise and standardized approach to aseptic OB treatment and the efficacy of intra-bursal corticosteroid injections (CSI). The objective of this review is to systematically evaluate the non-surgical treatment options for aseptic OB. Methods: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA recommendations. The English and non-English literature search was performed in 5 medical databases to identify studies evaluating the treatment of OB. All included studies were evaluated for risk of bias (RoB) using the revised Cochrane RoB tool for randomized control trials (RCTs) and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for case–control and cohort studies. Results: For the final analyses, 2 RCTs and 2 observational studies were included. The RoB for the RCTs was high and both failed to demonstrate a significant difference in terms of the resolution of OB and bursal tenderness among various invasive and non-invasive treatment options. Corticosteroid injection (CSI) was associated with a significant decline in the duration of symptoms. However, it was associated with a higher number of complications including bursal infection and skin atrophy. Conclusion: Based on the available data, it appears that the clinical resolution of aseptic OB can occur with conservative methods if implemented earlier in the disease course. Although CSI is more effective than other treatments, it should be reserved for refractory cases because of a higher complication rate.(AU)

Objetivo: La bursitis olecraniana (BO), que se caracteriza por inflamación y acumulación de líquido en la bolsa olecraniana, es una situación muy común en el ámbito ambulatorio. Existen datos heterogéneos en cuanto al enfoque terapéutico gradual y estandarizado de la BO séptica y la eficacia de las inyecciones de corticosteroides (CSI) intrabursales. El objetivo de esta revisión es evaluar sistemáticamente las opciones terapéuticas no quirúrgicas para la BO séptica. Métodos: Esta revisión sistemática se llevó a cabo de acuerdo con las recomendaciones PRISMA. La búsqueda en la literatura inglesa y no inglesa fue realizada en 5 bases de datos médicas para identificar los estudios que evalúan el tratamiento de la BO. Se evaluó el riesgo de sesgo (RoB) en todos los estudios incluidos, utilizando la herramienta RoB Cochrane revisada para ensayos controlados aleatorizados (ECA), y la escala Newcastle-Ottawa (NOS) para estudios de casos y controles y de cohortes. Resultados: Para los análisis finales se incluyeron 2 ECA y 2 estudios observacionales. El RoB para los ECA fue alto, no demostrando ambos estudios una diferencia significativa en términos de resolución de la BO y sensibilidad bursal entre las diversas opciones terapéuticas invasivas y no invasivas. La inyección de corticosteroides (CSI) estuvo asociada a una reducción significativa de la duración de los síntomas. Sin embargo, también estuvo asociada a un número más elevado de complicaciones, incluyendo infección bursal y atrofia cutánea. Conclusión: Sobre la base de los datos disponibles, parece que la resolución clínica de la BO séptica puede producirse con métodos conservadores si estos implementan con carácter temprano en el curso de la enfermedad. Aunque las CSI son más efectivas que otros tratamientos, deberían reservarse para casos refractarios, dada su tasa de complicación más alta.(AU)

Effectiveness of the therapeutic laser in the syndrome of dysfunction of the temporomandibular joint of arthrogenic origin / Eficacia del láser terapéutico en el síndrome de disfunción de la articulación temporomandibular de origen artrogénico

Abstract Temporomandibular joint dysfunction syndrome (TMD), is a collective term characterized by symptoms involving chewing muscles, temporomandibular joint and orofacial structures. The efficacy of low intensity laser (LLLT) Gallium arsenide, in combination with a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) was evaluated. The main objective was to evaluate the maximum mouth opening without pain (ABM), arthralgia in the joint capsule through visual analog scale (VAS), laterality, protrusion, joint noises and count of tablets ingested per group. A controlled clinical trial (double-blind-randomized) was carried out in 30 subjects, who presented DTM of arthrogenic etiology; 5 applications of LLLT were made with wavelength of 810 nm, output optical power of 100-200 mw, emission PW=Pulsed (1-10,000Hz), dose of 10 jouls-cm², time of 1.44 minutes in mouth closed and with the mouth half open. One more follow-up appointment per month. There were two groups: experimental and control group, where different variables were analyzed (ABM, laterality, protrusion, VAS and sociodemographic). In the control group, a supposed LT application (not active) was made, for later comparison. Pain-free ABM was assessed in all appointments in addition to the other clinical parameters. Repeated measures analysis was performed with mixed models. Thirty patients were included of which 28 finished the treatment, two of them were lost during follow-up. The groups were similar in all their baseline variables. There were no statistically significant differences when applying the final multiple regression analysis, in the ABM, or in any other of the clinical parameters analyzed. LT was not effective in treating arthrogenic DTM.

Resumen El síndrome de disfunción de la articulación temporomandibular (DTM) es un término colectivo caracterizado por síntomas que involucran músculos de la masticación, articulación temporomandibular y estructuras orofaciales. Se evaluó la eficacia del láser de baja intensidad (LLLT) Arseniuro de galio, en combinación con un antiinflamatorio no esteroideo (AINE). El objetivo principal fue evaluar la apertura bucal máxima sin dolor (ABM), la artralgia en cápsula articular a través de escala visual análoga (EVA), lateralidades, protrusión, ruidos articulares y conteo de tabletas ingeridas por grupo. Se realizó un ensayo clínico controlado (doble ciego-aleatorizado) en 30 sujetos, que presentaban DTM de etiología artrogénica; se les realizaron 5 aplicaciones de LLLT con longitud de onda de 810 nm, potencia óptica de salida de 100-200 mw, emisión PW=Pulsed (1-10,000Hz), dosis de10 jouls-cm², tiempo de1.44 minutos a boca cerrada y con la boca semiabierta. Una cita más de seguimiento al mes. Se tuvieron dos grupos: experimental y grupo control, donde se analizaron diferentes variables (ABM, lateralidades, protrusión, EVA y sociodemográficas). En el grupo control se hizo una supuesta aplicación LT (no activo), para posterior comparación. En todas las citas se valoró la ABM sin dolor además de los otros parámetros clínicos. Se realizó análisis de medidas repetidas con modelos mixtos. Se incluyeron 30 pacientes de los cuales 28 finalizaron el tratamiento, dos de ellos se perdieron en el seguimiento. Los grupos fueron similares en todas sus variables basales. No hubo diferencias estadísticas significativas al aplicar los análisis de regresión múltiple finales, en la ABM, ni tampoco en ningún otro de los parámetros clínicos analizados. El LT no fue eficaz en el tratamiento de la DTM de origen artrogénico.

Anti-inflammatories for delayed onset muscle soreness: systematic review and meta-analysis / Antiinflamatorios para el dolor muscular de inicio tardío: revisión sistemática y metanálisis / Anti-inflamatórios para dor muscular de início tardio: revisão sistemática e metanálise

ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions in the treatment of delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS). Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs). Data sources: The PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, Scielo and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases were searched for RCTs published prior to August 3, 2020. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Studies that 1) used an RCT design; 2) evaluated the effectiveness of steroidal or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in treating DOMS; and 3) therapeutically used drugs after exercise were included. Results: In total, 26 studies (patients = 934) were eligible for inclusion in the qualitative analysis on the treatment of DOMS. The results of the meta-analysis showed no superiority between the use and non-use of NSAIDs in the improvement of late muscle pain, as no statistically significant differences were verified (21 studies, n= 955; standard mean difference (SMD)= 0.02; 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.58, 0.63; p=0.94; I2=93%). The quality of the synthesized evidence was very low according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria, and there was significant heterogeneity among the included studies. Conclusion: The results demonstrate that NSAIDs are not superior to controls/placebos in treating DOMS. The inclusion of both studies with dose-response protocols and those with exercise protocols may have influenced the results. In addition, the high risk of bias identified reveals that limitations need to be considered when interpreting the results. Level of evidence I; ystematic review of RCT (Randomized and Controlled Clinical Trials).

RESUMEN Objetivo: Investigar la efectividad de las intervenciones farmacológicas en el tratamiento del dolor muscular de aparición tardía (DOMS). Metodología: Revisión sistemática y metanálisis de ensayos clínicos controlados aleatorios (RCT). Fuentes de datos: Se realizaron búsquedas en las bases de datos de PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, Scielo y Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) para ECA publicados antes del 3 de agosto de 2020. Criterios de elegibilidad para la selección de estudios: Estudios en los que 1) se utilizó un diseño de RCT; 2) se evaluó la eficacia de los fármacos antiinflamatorios no esteroideos (AINE) y esteroideos en el tratamiento de DOMS; y 3) se incluyó el uso terapéutico de medicamentos para dolor después del ejercicio. Resultados: En total, 26 estudios (pacientes = 934) fueron elegibles para su inclusión en el análisis cualitativo sobre el tratamiento de DOMS. Los resultados encontrados en el metanálisis no demostraron superioridad entre el uso y no uso de AINE para mejorar el dolor muscular tardío cuando se comparó con una condición de control, ya que no hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas (21 estudios, n = 955; media estándar diferencia = 0,02; intervalo de confianza (IC) del 95% −0,58, 0,63; p = 0,94; I2 = 93%). La calidad de la evidencia encontrada se clasificó como muy baja según los criterios del "Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation" (GRADE), principalmente porque existe una heterogeneidad significativa entre los estudios incluidos. Conclusión: Los resultados demuestran que los AINE no son superiores a los controles o placebos en el tratamiento de DOMS. La inclusión de ambos modelos de estudio con protocolos de dosis-respuesta y protocolos de ejercicio puede haber influido en los resultados. Además, el alto riesgo de sesgo identificado revela que la interpretación de los resultados debe verse con limitaciones. Nivel de evidencia: I; Revisión sistemática de ECRC (Ensayos clínicos aleatorizados y controlados).

RESUMO Objetivo: Investigar a eficácia das intervenções farmacológicas no tratamento da dor muscular de início tardio (DOMS). Desenho: Revisão sistemática e metanálise de estudos clínicos randomizados e controlados (RCTs). Fontes de dados: Os bancos de dados PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, Scielo e Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) foram pesquisados em busca de RCTs publicados antes de 3 de agosto de 2020. Critérios de elegibilidade para selecionar estudos: Estudos que 1) usaram um desenho de RCT; 2) avaliaram a eficácia de anti-inflamatórios esteroides ou não esteroides (AINEs) no tratamento de DOMS e 3) incluíram tratamento medicamentoso depois de exercício. Resultados: No total, 26 estudos (pacientes = 934) foram elegíveis para inclusão na análise qualitativa do tratamento de DOMS. Os resultados da metanálise não mostraram superioridade entre o uso e não uso de AINEs na melhora da dor muscular tardia, pois não foram verificadas diferenças estatisticamente significativas (21 estudos, n = 955; diferença média padronizada (SMD) = 0,02; Intervalo de confiança (IC) de 95% −0,58, 0,63; p = 0,94; I2 = 93%). A qualidade da evidência encontrada foi muito baixa de acordo com os critérios da Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE), e verificou-se heterogeneidade significante entre os estudos incluídos. Conclusão: Os resultados demonstram que os AINEs não são superiores aos controles ou placebos no tratamento de DOMS. A inclusão de estudos com protocolos de dose-resposta e com protocolos de exercícios podem ter influenciado os resultados. Além disso, o alto risco de viés identificado revela que as limitações devem ser consideradas na interpretação dos resultados. Nível de evidência I; Revisão sistemática de ECRC (Estudos clínicos randomizados e controlados).

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the elderly. Agreement with safe prescription recommendations according to cardiovascular and gastrointestinal risks.

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVE: Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs are the cornerstone in the treatment of acute and chronic pain due to inflammation in musculoskeletal conditions. Even though adverse side-effects are associated, their use is common in the elderly patients. Our aim is to determine the prescription trend of NSAIDs, the evaluation for gastrointestinal (GI) and cardiovascular (CV) risks, and the level of agreement with prescription guidelines. METHODS: We conducted an observation and descriptive study in a general hospital geriatrics consultation. RESULTS: From the 231 patients only 59 patients had a NSAIDs prescription. The most frequently prescribed was Acetaminophen, in 29(49.1%) patients, Celecoxib was prescribed in 11(18.6%) patients, Piroxicam in 5(8.4%) patients, Acetaminophen plus Celecoxib plus Omeprazole in 4 (6.7%), Acetaminophen plus Piroxicam in 2 (0.3%) patients, and Acetaminophen plus Diclofenac plus Celecoxib in 1 patient (1.6%). In the Framingham risk classification there were 160/231 (69.3%) patients in Very High Risk and 71/231 (30.7%) patients in High Risk. There were no patients in Low Risk. GI Risk: 79 patients (34.1%) had a peptic ulcer disease history. There were 55/231 (23.8%) in the High GI Risk classification, 102/231 (44.1%) in Intermediate GI Risk and 74/231 (32%) in the Low Risk. The level of agreement between the prescribed versus recommended NSAIDs according the CV and GI risks was measured with a contingence table and the kappa statistic of 0.37 p=0.001. CONCLUSION: There is a low level of agreement between prescribed and recommended NSAID in elderly population.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the elderly. Agreement with safe prescription recommendations according to cardiovascular and gastrointestinal risks / Medicamentos antiinflamatorios no esteroideos en ancianos. Concordancia con las guías de prescripción segura con respecto a los riesgos cardiovasculares y gastrointestinales

Introduction/objective: Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs are the cornerstone in the treatment of acute and chronic pain due to inflammation in musculoskeletal conditions. Even though adverse side-effects are associated, their use is common in the elderly patients. Our aim is to determine the prescription trend of NSAIDs, the evaluation for gastrointestinal (GI) and cardiovascular (CV) risks, and the level of agreement with prescription guidelines. Methods: We conducted an observation and descriptive study in a general hospital geriatrics consultation. Results: From the 231 patients only 59 patients had a NSAIDs prescription. The most frequently prescribed was Acetaminophen, in 29(49.1%) patients, Celecoxib was prescribed in 11(18.6%) patients, Piroxicam in 5(8.4%) patients, Acetaminophen plus Celecoxib plus Omeprazole in 4 (6.7%), Acetaminophen plus Piroxicam in 2 (0.3%) patients, and Acetaminophen plus Diclofenac plus Celecoxib in 1 patient (1.6%). In the Framingham risk classification there were 160/231 (69.3%) patients in Very High Risk and 71/231 (30.7%) patients in High Risk. There were no patients in Low Risk. GI Risk: 79 patients (34.1%) had a peptic ulcer disease history. There were 55/231 (23.8%) in the High GI Risk classification, 102/231 (44.1%) in Intermediate GI Risk and 74/231 (32%) in the Low Risk. The level of agreement between the prescribed versus recommended NSAIDs according the CV and GI risks was measured with a contingence table and the kappa statistic of 0.37 p=0.001. Conclusion: There is a low level of agreement between prescribed and recommended NSAID in elderly population.(AU)

Introducción/objetivo: Los medicamentos antiinflamatorios no esteroideos son la piedra angular en el tratamiento del dolor agudo y crónico debido a la inflamación en las afecciones musculoesqueléticas. Aunque los efectos secundarios adversos están asociados, su uso es común en pacientes de edad avanzada. Nuestro objetivo es determinar la tendencia de prescripción de los AINE, la evaluación de riesgos gastrointestinales (GI) y cardiovasculares (CV), y el nivel de acuerdo con las pautas de prescripción. Métodos:Realizamos un estudio descriptivo y de observación en una consulta de geriatría de un hospital general. Resultados: De los 231 pacientes, solo 59 pacientes tenían una prescripción de AINE. El más frecuentemente recetado fue acetaminofeno, en 29 (49,1%) pacientes, celecoxib se prescribió en 11 (18,6%) pacientes, piroxicam en 5 (8,4%) pacientes, acetaminofeno más celecoxib más omeprazole en 4 (6,7%), acetaminofeno más piroxicam en 2 (0,3%) pacientes, y acetaminofeno más diclofenaco más celecoxib en un paciente (1,6%). En la clasificación de riesgo de Framingham había 160/231 (69,3%) pacientes en muy alto riesgo y 71/231 (30,7%) pacientes en alto riesgo. No hubo pacientes en bajo riesgo. Riesgo gastrointestinal: 79 pacientes (34,1%) tenían antecedentes de enfermedad de úlcera péptica. Hubo 55/231 (23,8%) en la clasificación de riesgo GI alto, 102/231 (44,1%) en riesgo GI intermedio y 74/231 (32%) en riesgo bajo. El nivel de acuerdo entre los AINE prescritos versus los recomendados según los riesgos CV y GI se midió con una tabla de contingencia y el estadístico kappa de 0,37 p=0,001. Conclusión: Existe un bajo nivel de acuerdo entre los AINE prescritos y recomendados en la población de edad avanzada.(AU)

Factores asociados con el uso de inhibidores del factor de necrosis tumoral alfa en una población de pacientes colombianos con espondiloartritis / Factors associated with the use of tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors in a population of Colombian patients with spondyloarthritis

RESUMEN Introducción: El uso de TNFi es cada vez más frecuente en los pacientes con espondiloartritis. Identificar tempranamente aquellos que los requerirán o poder predecir su uso puede ayudar a hacer un tratamiento más efectivo y oportuno racionalizando su uso. Objetivo: Determinar los factores qué mejor explican la indicación de TNFi en la población en estudio. Material y métodos: La asociación entre el uso de medicamentos anti-TNFα y las variables categóricas demográficas, clínicas, de laboratorio, radiológicas y de tratamiento se exploró por prueba exacta de Fisher. La asociación con las variables cuantitativas fue evaluada con t de Student o U de Mann Withney, de acuerdo con su distribución. Aquellas variables con p < 0,25 fueron ingresadas a modelos univariante de regresión logística explicativa para construir los OR crudos; aquellas con p < 0,25 se incluyeron en el modelo multivariante para construir OR ajustados. Resultados y discusión: La población está constituida por 181 pacientes. Modelo univariante: la artritis reactiva, uretritis y compromiso periférico fueron factores protectores para el uso de TNFi. Espondiloartritis axial, lumbalgia inflamatoria, dolor glúteo alternante, rigidez matinal sacroilitis demostrada por cualquier método, tratamiento con inhibidores COX-2, tiempo de evolución de tres arios o más y los puntajes de BASDAI y BASFI se asociaron con el uso de TNFi. Modelo multivariante: artritis reactiva (OR 0,1, IC 95% 0,012-0,86, p = 0,036), lumbalgia inflamatoria (OR 13,63, IC 95% 1,36-136, p = 0,026), sacroilitis (OR 7,71, IC 95% 1,04-57, p = 0,045, uso de coxib (OR 10,1, IC 95% 2,71-37,62, p = 0,001) y el puntaje máximo de BASDAI (4-6: OR 6,1, IC 95% 1,3-28,7, p = 0,022, mayor de 6: OR 15,8, IC 95% 2,2-113, p = 0,006) se asociaron independientemente con el uso de TNFi. El uso de coxib se asoció con la indicación de usar TNFi tanto en los pacientes con espondiloartritis axial (OR 4,2, IC 95% 1,74-10,11, p = 0,001) como periférica (OR 4, IC 95% 1,85-8,62, p < 0,001). Conclusiones: El inicio de la enfermedad en la forma de artritis reactiva se comportó como un factor protector para la necesidad posterior de usar TNFi, mientras que presentar lumbalgia inflamatoria, sacroilitis demostrada por cualquier método, el tratamiento con coxib y el puntaje máximo de BASDAI mayor de 4 se asociaron con el uso de estos medicamentos.

ABSTRACT Introduction: The use of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha inhibitors is increasing in patients with spondyloarthritis. Early identification of those that would require them, or the ability to predict their use, could lead to a more effective and timely treatment by rationalizing their use. Objective: To determine factors that better explain the indication of TNFi in the study population. Material and methods: The association between anti-TNFα use and categorical demographic, clinical, laboratory, radiological and treatment variables was explored using Pearson's Chi2 or Fisher's exact test. The association with the quantitative variables was evaluated using Student's t test or Mann Whitney U test, depending on their distribution. Those variables with P < 0.25 were entered into univariate models of explanatory logistic regression to cons truct crude ORs, and those with P < 0.25 were included in the multivariate model to construct adjusted ORs. Results and discussion: The study population includes 181 patients. In the univariate model: reactive arthritis, urethritis, and peripheral involvement were protective factors for the use of TNFi. Axial spondyloarthritis, inflammatory lumbalgia, alternating gluteal pain, morning stiffness, sacroiliitis demonstrated by any method, treatment with COX-2 inhibitors, evolu tion time of three years or more, and BASDAI and BASFI scores were associated with the use of TNFi. Multivariate model: reactive arthritis (P = 0.036), inflammatory back pain (P = 0.026), sacroiliitis (P = 0.045), use of coxibs (P = 0.001) and the maximum score of BASDAI (P = 0.022, P = 0.006) were independently associated with the use of TNFi. The use of coxibs was associa ted with the indication of using TNFi in both patients with axial spondyloarthritis (P = 0.001) and peripheral (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The onset of the disease in the form of reactive arthritis behaved as a protective factor for the subsequent need to use TNFi, while presenting with inflammatory back pain, sacroiliitis, demonstrated by any method, treatment with coxibs, and the maximum score of BASDAI greater than 4 associated with the use of these medications.

Comparison of disease activity in patients with ankylosing spondylitis under TNFi or NSAID treatment, is there any difference? An observational study / Comparación de la actividad de la enfermedad en pacientes de espondilitis anquilosante con terapia de anti-TNF o AINE. ¿Existe alguna diferencia? Estudio observacional

Objective: To assess whether there are any real-life differences between ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients treated with NSAID or TNF inhibitors (TNFi) regarding disease activity.Methods: This is an observational transversal unicentric study with retrospective retrieval of data from clinical records of all AS patients attended in our hospital. We compared clinical activity measured by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) scores between patients treated with NSAID and those treated with TNFi, in terms of low disease activity defined as BASDAI<4, and inactivity when BASDAI≤2. As secondary variables, we also collected epidemiological, clinical and radiological data from all those patients. Results: A total of 152 AS patients (81% male), with an average age of 49.45±12.38 years and a disease duration of 13.5±9.79 years were included in the study. Eighty-nine patients (58.6%) were treated with NSAID and 63 (41.4%) with TNFi. The proportion of patients with low disease activity and inactive disease was significantly higher in the TNFi treatment group compared to the NSAID group (81 vs. 47, P=.0001) and (44 vs. 24, P=.007), respectively. Patients treated with NSAIDs also showed significantly more global pain and night pain than those under TNFi therapy. The BASFI score and especially the type of treatment (NSAID or TNFI) were the only variables independently associated with low disease activity or inactive disease. Conclusion: In real world practice, AS patients under TNFi treatment show a better control of clinical symptoms than those under NSAIDs.(AU)

Objetivo: Evaluar si existen diferencias entre los pacientes con espondilitis anquilosante (EA) tratados con AINE o inhibidores del TNF (anti-TNF), con relación a la actividad de la enfermedad en la vida real. Métodos: Estudio observacional transversal unicéntrico con recopilación retrospectiva de datos de historias clínicas de todos los pacientes de EA examinados en nuestro hospital. Comparamos la actividad clínica, medida con la puntuación del Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), entre los pacientes tratados con AINE y los tratados con anti-TNF, en términos de baja actividad de la enfermedad definida como BASDAI<4 e inactividad, con BASDAI≤2. Como variables secundarias recopilamos también los datos clínicos, epidemiológicos y radiológicos de dichos pacientes. Resultados: Incluimos en el estudio un total de 152 pacientes de EA (81% varones), con una edad media de 49,45±12,38años y una duración de la enfermedad de 13,5±9,79años. Ochenta y nueve pacientes (58,6%) fueron tratados con AINE y 63 (41,4%) con anti-TNF. La proporción de pacientes con baja actividad de la enfermedad e inactividad fue significativamente superior en el grupo de terapia anti-TNF, en comparación con el grupo AINE: 81 vs. 47, p=0,0001, y 44 vs. 24, p=0,007, respectivamente. Los pacientes tratados con AINE reflejaron también un dolor global significativamente mayor que aquellos con terapia de anti-TNF. La puntuación BASFI, y especialmente el tipo de tratamiento (AINE o anti-TNF), fueron las únicas variables independientemente asociadas a baja actividad de la enfermedad o a inactividad de esta. Conclusión: En la práctica real, los pacientes de EA con terapia anti-TNF reflejan un mejor control de los síntomas clínicos que aquellos con tratamiento de AINE.(AU)

Hydration with Lactated Ringer's solution combined with rectal diclofenac in the prevention of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. / Hidratación con Ringer Lactato combinado con diclofenaco rectal en la prevención de pancreatitis poscolangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica.

OBJECTIVE: Different measures are recommended to reduce pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). We conducted a study in patients with ERCP treated with rectal diclofenac or lactated Ringer's solution, or both interventions, to assess whether there is a decrease in the number of cases of post-ERCP pancreatitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A mixed cohort study involving 1,896 patients from 2009 to 2018. Up to June 2012 without treatment (Group I). Subsequently, 100mg of rectal diclofenac (Group II). Since 2016, lactated Ringer's solution 200ml/hour during the procedure and 4hours after it, in addition to 500ml over 30minutes when the pancreas was cannulated (Group III). Since 2017, lactated Ringer's solution plus Diclofenac (Group IV). There were 725 patients in group I, and 530, 227 and 414 patients in groups II, III and IV, respectively. Factors predisposing to post-ERCP pancreatitis and post-ERCP pancreatitis cases that were defined by consensus criteria have been collected. RESULTS: There were 65 cases of post-ERCP pancreatitis (3.4%); 2.9%, 3.4%, 3.1% and 4.3% in groups I, II, III and IV, respectively (P=.640). In group I, there was 4.2% of post-ERCP pancreatitis in naïve papillae and 4%, 4.9% and 6.3% in groups II, III and IV, respectively (P=.585). The severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis and adverse effects were similar in all groups. 38.4% were high-risk patients. There were also no differences in post-ERCP pancreatitis in this group (P=.501). CONCLUSION: In this work, no benefit was obtained with diclofenac plus hydration in reducing the number and severity of cases of post-ERCP pancreatitis nor with the other prophylactic measures.

Comparison of disease activity in patients with ankylosing spondylitis under TNFi or NSAID treatment, is there any difference? An observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether there are any real-life differences between ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients treated with NSAID or TNF inhibitors (TNFi) regarding disease activity. METHODS: This is an observational transversal unicentric study with retrospective retrieval of data from clinical records of all AS patients attended in our hospital. We compared clinical activity measured by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) scores between patients treated with NSAID and those treated with TNFi, in terms of low disease activity defined as BASDAI<4, and inactivity when BASDAI≤2. As secondary variables, we also collected epidemiological, clinical and radiological data from all those patients. RESULTS: A total of 152 AS patients (81% male), with an average age of 49.45±12.38 years and a disease duration of 13.5±9.79 years were included in the study. Eighty-nine patients (58.6%) were treated with NSAID and 63 (41.4%) with TNFi. The proportion of patients with low disease activity and inactive disease was significantly higher in the TNFi treatment group compared to the NSAID group (81 vs. 47, P=.0001) and (44 vs. 24, P=.007), respectively. Patients treated with NSAIDs also showed significantly more global pain and night pain than those under TNFi therapy. The BASFI score and especially the type of treatment (NSAID or TNFI) were the only variables independently associated with low disease activity or inactive disease. CONCLUSION: In real world practice, AS patients under TNFi treatment show a better control of clinical symptoms than those under NSAIDs.

Revisión del tratamiento farmacológico del dolor secundario a artrosis con paracetamol, antinflamatorios no esteroideos clásicos (AINE) y los inhibidores selectivos de la ciclooxigenasa tipo 2 (COXIB) / Review of the pharmacological treatment of osteoarthritis pain with paracetamol, non-steroid anti-inflammatory (NSAIDSS) and selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors (COXIB)

En este monográfico se realiza una revisión de todos los aspectos relacionados con la artrosis para poder ofrecer al/la paciente el manejo más óptimo a la luz de la bibliografía disponible en el momento de redacción del mismo. En este artículo en concreto realizamos una revisión bibliográfica del tratamiento farmacológico de la artrosis con paracetamol, antinflamatorios no esteroideos clásicos (AINE) e inhibidores selectivos de la ciclooxigenasa tipo 2 (COXIB). Actualizamos los aspectos que más nos interesan desde un punto de vista clínico: eficacia, seguridad, comparativa dentro de estas opciones y con el resto de alternativas (intervencionistas u otras farmacológicas), para poder decidir los perfiles de pacientes en los que puede estar indicado este tipo de opciones farmacológicas, el momento evolutivo de su enfermedad o incluso el tiempo de mantenimiento de este tipo de fármacos. Para ello hemos realizado una revisión bibliográfica de los estudios que evalúan el efecto de estos fármacos analgésicos en la artrosis mediante una búsqueda electrónica utilizando Google Scholar, Medline/PubMed y la base de datos Cochrane de revisiones sistemáticas con el fin de recopilar la literatura disponible entre los años 2000 y 2020.(AU)

In this monograph, a review of all aspects related to osteoarthritis is carried out in order to offer the patient with osteoarthritis the most optimal management in light of the bibliography available at the time of writing. In this specific article, we made a bibliographic review of the pharmacological treatment of osteoarthritis with paracetamol, classical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and selective cyclooxygenase type 2 inhibitors (COXIBS). We update the aspects that interest us most from a clinical point of view: efficacy, safety, comparison within these options and with the rest of the alternatives (interventional or other pharmacological) for being able to decide the patient profiles in which this type is indicated of pharmacological options, the evolutionary moment of the disease or even the maintenance time of this type of drug. For reaching our objective, we have carried out a bibliographic review of the studies evaluating the effect of these analgesic drugs in osteoarthritis with an electronic search using Google Scholar, Medline/PubMed and the Cochrane database of systematic reviews to compile the available literature between the years 2000 and 2020.(AU)

Effect of pre-administered flurbiprofen axetil on the EC50 of propofol during anesthesia in unstimulated patients: a randomized clinical trial / Efeito da pré‐ administração de flurbiprofeno axetil na CE50 do propofol durante anestesia em pacientes não estimulados: estudo clínico randomizado

Abstract Background and objectives Preoperative use of flurbiprofen axetil (FA) is extensively adopted to modulate the effects of analgesia. However, the relationship between FA and sedation agents remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of different doses of FA on the median Effective Concentration (EC50) of propofol. Methods Ninety-six patients (ASA I or II, aged 18-65 years) were randomly assigned into one of four groups in a 1:1:1:1 ratio. Group A (control group) received 10 mL of Intralipid, and groups B, C and D received 0.5 mg.kg−1, 0.75 mg.kg−1 and 1 mg.kg−1 of FA, respectively, 10 minutes before induction. The depth of anesthesia was measured by the Bispectral Index (BIS). The "up-and-down" method was used to calculate the EC50 of propofol. During the equilibration period, if BIS ≤ 50 (or BIS > 50), the next patient would receive a 0.5 µg.mL−1-lower (or -higher) propofol Target-Controlled Infusion (TCI) concentration. The hemodynamic data were recorded at baseline, 10 minutes after FA administration, after induction, after intubation and 15 minutes after intubation. Results The EC50 of propofol was lower in Group C (2.32 µg.mL−1, 95% Confidence Interval [95% CI] 1.85-2.75) and D (2.39 µg.mL−1, 95% CI 1.91-2.67) than in Group A (2.96 µg.mL−1, 95% CI 2.55-3.33) (p = 0.023, p = 0.048, respectively). There were no significant differences in the EC50 between Group B (2.53 µg.mL−1, 95% CI 2.33-2.71) and Group A (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences in Heart Rate (HR) among groups A, B and C. The HR was significantly lower in Group D than in Group A after intubation (66 ± 6 vs. 80 ± 10 bpm, p < 0.01) and 15 minutes after intubation (61 ± 4 vs. 70 ± 8 bpm, p < 0.01). There were no significant differences among the four groups in Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) at any time point. The MAP of the four groups was significantly lower after induction, after intubation, and 15 minutes after intubation than at baseline (p < 0.05). Conclusion High-dose FA (0.75 mg.kg−1 or 1 mg.kg−1) reduces the EC50 of propofol, and 1 mg.kg−1 FA reduces the HR for adequate anesthesia in unstimulated patients. Although this result should be investigated in cases of surgical stimulation, we suggest that FA pre-administration may reduce the propofol requirement when the depth of anesthesia is measured by BIS.

Resumo Justificativa e objetivos A administração pré‐operatória de Flurbiprofeno Axetil (FA) é amplamente usada para a modulação da analgesia. No entanto, a relação entre FA e fármacos sedativos permanece obscura. Neste estudo, nosso objetivo foi investigar os efeitos de diferentes doses de FA na Concentração Efetiva mediana (CE50) do propofol. Métodos Noventa e seis pacientes (ASA I ou II, com idades de 18-65 anos) foram alocados aleatoriamente em quatro grupos na proporção de 1:1:1:1. Dez minutos antes da indução, o Grupo A (grupo controle) recebeu 10 mL de Intralipid, enquanto os grupos B, C e D receberam FA na dose de 0,5 mg.kg‐1; 0,75 mg.kg‐1 e 1 mg.kg‐1, respectivamente. A profundidade da anestesia foi medida pelo Índice Bispectral (BIS). O método up‐and‐down foi usado para calcular a CE50 do propofol. Durante o período de equilíbrio, se o valor do BIS fosse ≤ 50 ou BIS > 50, o próximo paciente tinha a infusão de propofol ajustada para uma concentração alvo‐controlada 0,5 µg.mL‐1 inferior ou superior, respectivamente. Os dados hemodinâmicos foram registrados no início do estudo, 10 minutos após a administração de FA, após a indução, após a intubação e 15 minutos após a intubação. Resultados A CE50 do propofol foi menor no Grupo C (2,32 µg.mL‐1, Intervalo de Confiança de 95% [95% IC] 1,85-2,75) e D (2,39 µg.mL‐1, 95% IC 1,91-2,67) do que no Grupo A (2,96 µg.mL‐1; 95% IC 2,55-3,33) (p = 0,023, p = 0,048, respectivamente). Não houve diferenças significantes na CE50 entre o Grupo B (2,53 µg.mL‐1, 95% IC 2,33-2,71) e o Grupo A (p > 0,05). Não houve diferenças significantes na Frequência Cardíaca (FC) entre os grupos A, B e C. A FC foi significantemente menor no grupo D do que no grupo A após a intubação (66 ± 6 vs. 80 ± 10 bpm, p < 0,01) e 15 minutos após a intubação (61 ± 4 vs. 70 ± 8 bpm, p < 0,01). Não houve diferenças significantes entre os quatro grupos na Pressão Arterial Média (PAM) em qualquer momento. A PAM dos quatro grupos foi significantemente menor após a indução, após a intubação e 15 minutos após a intubação do que na linha de base (p < 0,05). Conclusão FA em altas doses (0,75 mg.kg‐1 ou 1 mg.kg‐1) reduz a CE50 do propofol, e 1 mg.kg‐1 de FA reduz a FC durante níveis adequados de anestesia em pacientes não estimulados. Embora esse resultado deva ser investigado na presença de estimulação cirúrgica, sugerimos que a pré‐administração de FA pode reduzir a necessidade de propofol durante anestesia cuja profundidade seja monitorada pelo BIS.

[Effect of pre-administered flurbiprofen axetil on the EC50 of propofol during anesthesia in unstimulated patients: a randomized clinical trial]. / Efeito da pré­administração de flurbiprofeno axetil na CE50 do propofol durante anestesia em pacientes não estimulados: estudo clínico randomizado.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Preoperative use of flurbiprofen axetil (FA) is extensively adopted to modulate the effects of analgesia. However, the relationship between FA and sedation agents remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of different doses of FA on the median Effective Concentration (EC50) of propofol. METHODS: Ninety-six patients (ASA I or II, aged 18-65 years) were randomly assigned into one of four groups in a 1:1:1:1 ratio. Group A (control group) received 10 mL of Intralipid, and groups B, C and D received 0.5 mg.kg-1, 0.75 mg.kg-1 and 1 mg.kg-1 of FA, respectively, 10 minutes before induction. The depth of anesthesia was measured by the Bispectral Index (BIS). The "up-and-down" method was used to calculate the EC50 of propofol. During the equilibration period, if BIS ≤ 50 (or BIS > 50), the next patient would receive a 0.5 µg.mL-1-lower (or-higher) propofol Target-Controlled Infusion (TCI) concentration. The hemodynamic data were recorded at baseline, 10 minutes after FA administration, after induction, after intubation, and 15 minutes after intubation. RESULTS: The EC50 of propofol was lower in Group C (2.32 µg.mL-1, 95% Confidence Interval [95% CI] 1.85-2.75) and D (2.39 µg.mL-1, 95% CI 1.91-2.67) than in Group A (2.96 µg.mL-1, 95% CI 2.55-3.33) (p = 0.023, p = 0.048, respectively). There were no significant differences in the EC50 between Group B (2.53 µg.mL-1, 95% CI 2.33-2.71) and Group A (p ˃ 0.05). There were no significant differences in Heart Rate (HR) among groups A, B and C. The HR was significantly lower in Group D than in Group A after intubation (66 ± 6 vs. 80 ± 10 bpm, p < 0.01) and 15 minutes after intubation (61 ± 4 vs. 70 ± 8 bpm, p < 0.01). There were no significant differences among the four groups in Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) at any time point. The MAP of the four groups was significantly lower after induction, after intubation, and 15 minutes after intubation than at baseline (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: High-dose FA (0.75 mg.kg-1 or 1 mg.kg-1) reduces the EC50 of propofol, and 1 mg.kg-1 FA reduces the HR for adequate anesthesia in unstimulated patients. Although this result should be investigated in cases of surgical stimulation, we suggest that FA pre-administration may reduce the propofol requirement when the depth of anesthesia is measured by BIS.

Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in the Elderly. Agreement With Safe Prescription Recommendations According to Cardiovascular and Gastrointestinal Risks.

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVE: Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs are the cornerstone in the treatment of acute and chronic pain due to inflammation in musculoskeletal conditions. Even though adverse side-effects are associated, their use is common in the elderly patients. Our aim is to determine the prescription trend of NSAIDs, the evaluation for gastrointestinal (GI) and cardiovascular (CV) risks, and the level of agreement with prescription guidelines. METHODS: We conducted an observation and descriptive study in a general hospital geriatrics consultation. RESULTS: From the 231 patients only 59 patients had a NSAIDs prescription. The most frequently prescribed was Acetaminophen, in 29(49.1%) patients, Celecoxib was prescribed in 11(18.6%) patients, Piroxicam in 5(8.4%) patients, Acetaminophen plus Celecoxib plus Omeprazole in 4 (6.7%), Acetaminophen plus Piroxicam in 2 (0.3%) patients, and Acetaminophen plus Diclofenac plus Celecoxib in 1 patient (1.6%). In the Framingham risk classification there were 160/231 (69.3%) patients in Very High Risk and 71/231 (30.7%) patients in High Risk. There were no patients in Low Risk. GI Risk: 79 patients (34.1%) had a peptic ulcer disease history. There were 55/231 (23.8%) in the High GI Risk classification, 102/231 (44.1%) in Intermediate GI Risk and 74/231 (32%) in the Low Risk. The level of agreement between the prescribed versus recommended NSAIDs according the CV and GI risks was measured with a contingence table and the kappa statistic of 0.37 p=0.001. CONCLUSION: There is a low level of agreement between prescribed and recommended NSAID in elderly population.

Clinical management of dogs with presumptive diagnosis of thoracolumbar intervertebral disc disease: 164 cases (2006-2017) / Tratamento clínico de cães com diagnóstico presuntivo de doença do disco intervertebral toracolombar: 164 casos (2006-2017)

This study aimed to identify dogs with presumptive diagnosis of cervical intervertebral disc disease (IVDD) submitted to clinical management and to evaluate the outcomes. Data were obtained from the medical records of patients with neurological dysfunction assisted at a University Veterinary Hospital from 2006 to 2017. In addition to the patients' records, dog owners responded to a questionnaire on the success of therapy. Four hundred and thirteen neurological records were evaluated, and 164 met the inclusion criteria of the study. The most common breed was Dachshund, followed by mongrels. Classification of neurological dysfunction in the study sample was as follows: 15.9% with grade I, 25.6% with grade II, 26.8% with grade III, 8.5% with grade IV, and 23.2% with grade V. Outcome was satisfactory in 71.6% of the dogs and unsatisfactory in 28.4% of them. Recurrence was observed in 27.7% of those with satisfactory outcomes. The clinical treatment of dogs with thoracolumbar IVDD is satisfactory, particularly for animals with milder disease grades (I, II, and III). There is possibility of recurrence with conservative therapy and clinical signs may be more severe.(AU)

O objetivo desse estudo foi identificar cães com diagnóstico presuntivo de DDIV toracolombar submetidos ao tratamento clínico, a fim de avaliar a resposta à terapia instituída. Foram revisados os registros neurológicos de cães atendidos pelo Serviço de Neurologia e Neurocirurgia Veterinária no período de 2006 a 2017 de um Hospital Veterinário Universitário. Foi realizada coleta de dados a partir dos registros e por meio de um questionário respondido pelos tutores. Foram avaliadas 413 fichas neurológicas de cães e obtidas informações para inclusão no estudo em 164 delas. As raças mais frequentes foram dachshunds, seguido de cães sem raça definida. Quanto ao grau de disfunção neurológica foi definido como grau I para 15,9% dos cães, grau II para 25,6%, grau III para 26,8%, grau IV para 8,5% e grau V para 23,2%. A recuperação foi satisfatória em 71,6% dos cães e insatisfatória em 28,4%. Dos que se recuperaram satisfatoriamente, 27,7% tiveram recidivas. Com base nos resultados obtidos pode-se concluir que o tratamento clínico em repouso absoluto e administração de anti-inflamatórios e analgésicos opióides para cães com DDIV toracolombar é efetivo, principalmente para cães em graus mais leves da doença (grau I, II e III). Há possibilidade de recidiva com esse tipo de terapia cujos sinais clínicos poderão ser mais graves.(AU)

Améliorer le rappel des individus âgés de 60 ans et plus à l'aide de l'entretien cognitif : une revue et méta-analyse.

Les aînés sont souvent perçus comme des témoins peu fiables, une perception qui est partiellement appuyée par des travaux qui démontrent que les témoignages des aînés tendent à être moins détaillés que ceux produits par des témoins plus jeunes. L'entretien cognitif est une technique d'interrogatoire qui repose sur des stratégies de rappel issues des sciences cognitives. Plusieurs travaux récents démontrent l'efficacité de l'entretien cognitif auprès d'échantillons de jeunes adultes. Toutefois, la recherche portant sur l'utilisation de l'entretien cognitif auprès de témoins âgés est récente et en développement. Le présent article effectue une synthèse des travaux portant sur l'efficacité de l'entretien cognitif auprès d'aînés ainsi qu'une méta-analyse des données publiées à ce jour. La méta-analyse comprend sept études traitant des performances de participants aînés et comparant l'efficacité de l'entretien cognitif à celle obtenue en employant d'autres techniques de rappel. Les résultats démontrent une augmentation du nombre de détails corrects rappelés quand l'entretien cognitif est utilisé. Cependant, les données actuelles ne permettent pas de conclusion valide pour le nombre de détails incorrects ou sur l'exactitude du rappel. La discussion présente les forces et faiblesses des travaux publiés à ce jour de manière à favoriser le développement futur de ce domaine de recherche.